Convergent Journey

A cuppa tea and a camera

Archive for ‘April 10th, 2012’

KONY2012 Redux

A month after the first KONY2012 video stirred up intense controversy, Invisible Children released a sequel, “Beyond Famous.” The tone and content of this video—much more detailed and factual, interviewing local activists and abductees on the ground—have clearly adapted based on the criticism the first video received. (It even opens with clips of praise and criticism from the media.)

There was a quote of Jason Russell’s that I reacted viscerally to: “No one wants a boring documentary on Africa.” His meltdown and hospitalization have undercut his credibility by a lot, and he clearly is absent from the production of this video. It’s interesting to note because this sequel, in a sense, is the “boring documentary” Russell claims wouldn’t have the same viral stickiness. Sure, it’s much more thorough, factually accurate and culturally sensitive, but as a result it’s also less flashy and doesn’t tug quite as hard on the heartstrings.

Was Russell right? If the first KONY2012 documentary had been made in the style of this sequel, would it have taken off the way it did?

I’m not sure; I’m still wrestling with this balance between substance and stickiness and probably always will. But I do have to say that this video is like so many nonprofit advocacy videos I’ve seen before. The documentary is very well-made, of course: beautifully filmed, with poignant footage and backable claims to what KONY 2012 has accomplished thus far. But it follows a familiar formula: facts conveyed through compelling infographics, emotion conveyed through primary interviews and predictably lilting music, hope inspired through activists’ personal testimonies. (I especially love the interviews with schoolchildren—you can see their passion just bursting off the screen.)

The video has amassed nearly 1.5 million views in four days, and is receiving more favorable though noticeably less coverage so far.

Whatever might be said about the KONY 2012 film controversy, it’s undeniable that taking a risky departure from the expected way of doing things had a huge impact, even eliciting a direct response from the LRA. It was strange that Invisible Children took so long to respond to the backlash; then it was deeply unfortunate that Jason Russell’s public meltdown threw a wrench in the organization’s plans and in his personal credibility.

So the impact of KONY2012 had a lot of both positive and negative potential. With this sequel and other follow-up steps in their campaign, I hope Invisible Children will use the opportunity to accomplish something meaningful—and that we viewers will do the same, rather than sink deeper into the complacency of armchair criticism.

About these ads
2 Comments

Unwitting Paparazzi

Question of the day

How many times do you think you’ve appeared in the background of someone else’s photo?*

To the man, second from left: I'm sorry, sir. Usually I refrain from posting unflattering photos of people, even those I don't know, but today you're a cautionary tale.

The stuff of private-eye stories

When I was taking a black and white photography class back in college, I often walked around my college town, snapping photos of this and that. Storefronts, nature, people.

As I pointed my camera upward to take a picture of a billboard, a smartly dressed businessman entered my frame. He would have been a pretty boring addition to the photo composition—wearing a wool overcoat, carrying a briefcase in one hand and a large bouquet in the other. But what made him interesting was that, as I clicked the shutter, he wielded the bouquet in front of his face like a shield. Like a beleaguered celebrity avoiding the paparazzi.

An unassuming man suddenly became interesting. Why was he so camera-shy? Who were those flowers for? Hmm? *Eyebrow raise*

When I developed the film, there he was, in one frame looking slightly off-camera. In the next, his face covered with flowers of shame.

It got me thinking.

Your face on Facebook

That was seven years ago, when Facebook existed but was far from omnipresent in the way it is today. Your social network still, mostly, comprised people you actually knew, and the possibility that photos of yourself / friends / family might crop up in the public domain was far from being an issue. Thanks to this man, though, I developed an early awareness and concern about Facebook privacy settings. Not only were my friends posting photos of me and tagging me in them, but it was also possible that complete strangers were posting photos of me that I didn’t know existed. Even if I were untagged and just part of the background, it was unnerving to think that my image might very well be plastered all over the Internet.

The following year, I worked at an office in the middle of Times Square, where I found myself in the way of some tourist’s photo at least once a day, on average. So I became really good at averting my face whilst pretending to be busy looking in the direction of oncoming traffic, or something like that.

Not so camera shy anymore

During my travels though, I’ve noticed a new phenomenon that is intriguing to me. People actually pose for my photos, as though I knew them, or as though they had in fact asked me to take it for them. And not in a, I-brought-a-camera-to-a-remote-village-and-everyone-is-fascinated kind of way. I don’t have a fancy camera, just an understated point-and-shoot. They can surely tell I’m just another tourist like them.

Except that I’m a tourist with a blog. Ha!

They spotted me from afar and were determined to be in the photo! Tenacious tourists, those.

The guy to the right of Jack Sparrow clearly wants to be in my photo. The guy to the left, not so much.

A lovely-looking couple in Versailles. Honestly, if I knew who they were, I would send them this photo.

A few footnotes on privacy

*I don’t have an answer to my own question, but I certainly think it would be a fascinating number to try to come up with. But given the way Facebook is going with their creepy facial recognition technology, they might be able to answer that question for us…

**There’s a lot you should know about online privacy. Try searching your own name on Pipl.com, for example, and you’ll see how rigorously some companies are working to scrape information on you from everywhere including anything that is public on Facebook, your address records, any social media sites you’ve used, to create an extensive dossier on you. If that gives you the shivers, check out these articles on how to manage your Facebook privacy settings, here and here (specific to Timeline). This is worth doing, believe me. Unfortunately, there’s no way to make your Facebook profile photo private, which irks me to no end, because it means that any people-search website can access and put it in a database. Terrible!!

***Please be kind to yourself and manage your privacy settings. The friends I met in Versailles told me several instances in which people they knew had posted a video on Youtube, or a photo on Facebook, that then somehow got funneled into stock photography and was used in advertisements. What the…? How is that even allowed? I don’t remember the exact particulars, but one story was about how a woman traveled somewhere, the Netherlands maybe? and got off the metro to see a giant blown-up photo of her family used in an advertisement. Having seen the photo, she was able to sue for rights to the photo, but if she hadn’t happened upon it she never would even have known!

6 Comments